SWBG blog

Does the Draft Scottish Budget Meet Women’s Needs? The Women’s Economic Empowerment Group Discuss

The women’s economic empowerment group met after the Cabinet Secretary presented her budget to Parliament last week. The discussion focused on whether they felt their needs and the needs of women reflected in the budget decisions taken.

The Cabinet Secretary mentioned care 15 times, tax 16 times, poverty 5 times and investment 23 times while disabled/disability and women weren’t mentioned at all. Despite this, it could be argued that a number of the announcements made could benefit both women and disabled people. This included increased funding for wraparound care, funding for colleges to support disabled people into employment, and the increase in Scottish Child Payment for Under1’s from 2027.

The overall feeling of the group was that, while the Cabinet Secretary had said some positive things about areas they cared about, they weren’t sure that the funding allocated would actually make a difference in their lives. For instance, women shared their experiences of having difficulties getting GP appointments and of having their health concerns taken seriously. They felt that the additional funding to primary care and, in particular, to the walk-in GP clinics could make a difference. However, they were unclear how long this would take and if they and their families would benefit from the decisions taken anytime soon. They also queried what funding would be available to address the health inequalities experienced by women, who despite the publication and delivery of the Women’s Health Plan in 2021 are experiencing longer waiting times to access gynaecological services.1

The group had questions about whether budget decisions recognised the interconnectedness of the systems that we interact with. They highlighted this in relation to the announcement of funding for the Summer of Sport and the offer of free-swimming lessons. They questioned whether this budget announcement took any cognisance of decisions made in recent years at the local authority level to close or reduce the opening hours of facilities, and how funding to local authorities in general would support the delivery of these services. They queried whether disabled children would benefit from these announcements, and if the funding would be enough to address the barriers they often experience.

They also questioned whether additional funding for employability support would support more parents into work without addressing the challenges posed by the current childcare offer, or how, without changes in employers’ willingness to employ and support disabled people, this funding would lead to more disabled people accessing good-quality employment.

After listening to the Cabinet Secretary’s announcement, the questions posed to her afterwards and her responses, the group’s reaction was: “You can tell we are in an election year.” However, despite being in an election year, there were things the group felt were missing from the budget statement. While they welcomed the introduction of the mansion tax and the taxing of private jets, they felt that further changes were needed to make the system more progressive overall. They were also concerned about social care. While it had been mentioned, they weren’t convinced that the Budget paid enough attention to the problems being experienced across Scotland or to the recommendations made by the local government committee in their pre-budget scrutiny. 

Finally, there was a lack of optimism that these announcements would make a difference to them and their families due to the way these will be delivered at a local level.

Conclusion 

All in all, the group were left with a mixed feeling. While they recognised that the Budget included some positive announcements, it ultimately failed to tackle some systemic problems, such as the undervaluation of care and problems with implementation. 

Women’s Voices on Pre-Budget Scrutiny: Perspectives from the Women’s Economic Empowerment Group

In the run up to the introduction of the Scottish budget for 26-27, our Women’s Economic Empowerment group looked at the pre-budget scrutiny undertaken by two parliamentary committees: the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee and the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee.  

The pre-budget scrutiny process aims to give committees greater influence on the formulation of the budget, improve transparency and raise public understanding and awareness of the budget. 

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee 

The Health, Social Care and Sport Committee chose to look at mental health spending and how decisions on this area supported the delivery of the government’s priorities.  

The Health, Social Care and Sport committee conducted its pre-budget scrutiny by issuing a general call for evidence that ran from 26th to 15th June. They also wrote directly to all health and social care partnerships requesting information. The call for evidence received 51 responses, 39 of which were from organisations. Additionally, the Committee held three evidence sessions hearing from eight people: three academics, three public sector workers and two representatives from the third sector, only one of whom was a woman.   

The women who took part in our session queried why the committee didn’t hear directly from people with lived experience as part of their pre-budget scrutiny. They felt this could have aided the committee’s understanding about the way decisions taken to balance budgets had impacted on individuals who relied on services and those who provided care. This could have provided additional insight into how well current  funding was helping to achieve the Government’s priorities.  

The group also felt the language used in the evidence sessions and in the recommendations made by the committee could have been more accessible.  

The committee’s findings on the need for greater transparency in order to “follow the money”, and to increase the focus on the outcomes achieved from this investment, echo what the group had learned about the key principles of gender budgeting, and highlight that these are essential if budgets are to drive change and achieve government priorities. 

Given members of the group’s varying experiences of accessing services, and the postcode lottery that has developed, they are particularly interested in hearing the Government’s response to the committee’s call for the ring-fencing of certain elements of funding.  

The group felt that the need for greater accountability, and for better linking of decisions taken at a local level to achieving the priorities set out by Government, is essential if individuals in communities across Scotland are to experience better outcomes. 

Local Government, Housing and Planning committee 

The Local Government, Housing and Planning committee sought to understand how the Scottish budget supports the Scottish Government and Local Government’s ambition to “work together strategically to advance public service reform”. 

This committee took a different approach to their scrutiny. They wrote to key stakeholders inviting them to provide evidence. This closed call for evidence limited who the committee heard from.  

The group were interested in why the committee decided to limit who they invited to hear from as part of their pre-budget scrutiny, and how this might have impacted on the breadth of evidence they heard.  

The committee found that, while the Scottish Government is aiming to change public services ‘to be preventative, to better join up and be more efficient’, increased demand was impacting budgets and reducing the funding available for preventative approaches.  The committee recommended that the budget must recognise the challenges of increased demands for councils’ services, in particular social care delivery.   

Conclusion 

While the two committees took slightly different approaches, a key question from members of the Women’s Economic Empowerment project was how these approaches helped meet the aim of improving transparency and raising public understanding of the budget.  The lack of public or lived-experience involvement was clear, highlighting the need for more inclusive engagement to ensure that policy decisions reflect the realities of the communities parliamentarians aim to serve. 

The group will also be keeping an eye on whether the committees’ recommendations influence the budget published next week, particularly in relation to social care delivery 

Women’s Voices on the UK Budget: Reflections from Our Economic Empowerment Project

In this blog, our Training Lead, Heather Williams, shares the reflections of the women who are taking part in our second Economic Empowerment project.

What is a budget? This one, like those that have gone before, was a political occasion, except this was one that had been played out in the press for weeks before, with one policy trailed after another, testing the mood of the ‘nation’, or more accurately of the press pack and the opposition. 

As the Chancellor stood last Wednesday to make her statement, was her priority ensuring the lines on the spreadsheet added up providing enough fiscal head room to keep the markets happy? Was it about keeping Labour MPs onside and keeping manifesto commitments? Was it about creating some positive headlines for what is seen by many in the press as a failing administration or about making decisions which make life better for people across the UK? In reality, it was probably about all of these.  

But how did the decisions made land with a group of women from across Scotland? Our women’s economic empowerment group had mixed feelings about the Chancellor’s statement.  They were pleased that the two-child limit had been abolished.  Despite some of the headlines of the national newspapers about this being a budget for benefits street, there was a recognition of how self-defeating pushing children into poverty was as a policy choice.  

The Chancellor’s statement that we will all have to pay a little more was questioned about what a little more to Rachel Reeves would look like for those on low incomes and how effective the measures she was taking to reduce household costs would be.  There was little hope in the group that changes would curb the ever-increasing costs that households are facing. 

The silence from the Chancellor on care was deafening!  A quick check on the words used in her hour-long speech shows that she used the word tax 75 times, investment 36 and care on four occasions.  The lack of any mention about the social care sector, which is crumbling across the UK, highlights an inability across governments to understand that investment in this area is needed if we are to generate economic growth. 

The decision to limit the types of cars that can be accessed through the mobility scheme was a sop to the red tops and their mantra that the UK is a country of shirkers and strivers.  That shirkers shouldn’t be rewarded. This policy change won’t save the treasury a penny as the amount subsidised is the same if a disabled person uses it for a BMW or a Ford.  All this decision does is send the message that disabled people don’t deserve to have access to the same things as others in society as they are seen as shirkers, an example of groups being pitched against each other.  

Another lesson from this budget is never believe a politician that tells you that they will not raise taxes!  Or who treats tax like it’s a shameful thing failing to recognise the contribution taxes make towards the services we receive.

Some of the women on this group have direct experience of the harm caused by the failure to invest in public services.  They were clear that further investment was needed particularly in areas like social housing, social care and violence against women services. As we look forward to the Scottish Government’s budget statement in January, these are some of the areas women hope to hear more about than we did from the Chancellor. 

Don´t let the wind blow our mandala

In this powerful blog, Arantxa Garcia de Sola — a member of the project’s Steering Group — reflects on her experience contributing to the newly published report on Poverty and Inequality in Aberdeen. 

I’m someone who writes. I even find it easier to express myself in writing than when speaking. It’s not because of English—it’s not my mother tongue, no- but it’s the same in my beloved Spanish. And maybe that has something to do with one of the things I’ve really loved about being part of the steering group for this project. For me, it’s been new and fun to work with so many different ways of expressing things — discovering how to pull something out of the brain, the heart, or the gut… without writing a text longer than what fits in a post-it, sometimes not even using words. 

First day: pile of gossip magazines, cut out, cut out and present what problems women with limited resources face in this humid and windy city in the northeast of Scotland, Aberdeen (humid and windy are my words ?). I expressed my scepticism: “With those magazines?” I swallowed my scepticism. There, among the news about British and international celebrities, was hidden the often-present mold in the flats of the granite city, the double workday inside and outside the home, menopause, periods, gaslighting from GPs who see everything as hormonal… 

Ummmm… What’s next? Well, now, coloured post-its. Write down, write down the topics you want to discuss. Right, I wasn’t so sceptical anymore. Now I was more… just curious! Eager to catch a glimpse of new perspectives, because I didn’t use to talk about these things with other women. (Before this, at least) And then… what will happen? The post-its are regrouped, forming clusters, repeated topics emerge. We are nine, all very different, three of us from across the Atlantic; we are older, younger, and middle-aged; salaried, self-employed, juggling kids and the house, that is, working without pay; as fit as a whale or with those invisible disabilities that, because they’re not seen, are perhaps harder to deal with day to day, since one doesn’t immediately get understanding or support… but, oh… Wow! It turns out we’re affected by the same things: the incredible price of the buses, and rising; the lack of street lighting in a country where the night is soooooo long, just, only, nine of twelve months of the year; the cost of housing, the lack of support for those with caregiving responsibilities, have I mentioned the gaslighting from GPs? (yes? Oh, sorry, it must be the hormones). Hey, I thought these things only happened to me—but they don’t. The one 30 years younger, and the one 20 older, the one with no kids and the one with an extra one… no, it’s happening to all of us. 

Yes, there’s room for apps too, and we made a mind map on Canva, to see what stems from each of the themes we’ve identified. Because, yes, all nodes have branches and sub-branches and sub-sub-branches. Bus fare: keeps me from moving freely, I get isolated at home, my mental health miss socialization… or if it’s a must, like having to take the kids to school, well… then I’ll have to cut back on something else. C’mon… yeah, I don’t see that well with these glasses anymore, but they’ll do for one more year. The dentist… Let me LOL. 

A picture is worth a thousand words, they say, and another idea is to show in a mobile photo what poverty means to us: shopping trolleys full of yellow-label items, cheap, non-nutritious food that keeps the stomach full; the key to a home surrounded by the haze of a long-cherished dream… 

And here comes my favourite: modelling playdough, yes, we go back to childhood. The gatekeeper, the cordless phone… the difficulty isn’t even accessing services themselves but simply getting information about them—this takes shape in volume and pastel colours. What colour are paradoxes? Like those in a leaflet for an ESOL beginner’s course or for childcare grants to attend the course—that are only available in English. A teammate models a grid with little yellow rolls… if you don’t fit into any box… ohhhh… get ready to go round, and round. And round. 

If old traditions placed women knitting around a table… in this project we’ve woven lists of worries, fears, hopes and dreams cut short by the lack of pounds around a paper tablecloth as our canvas, with markers instead of needles. But just the same, with many hands knitting together… 

I also like mandalas. You have that little circle, and it grows, forming a design, intricate, complex, that from an outside perspective reveals clear patterns. That’s how I think our report has grown… like a mandala a collective mandala of experiences, needs, and hopes drawn by dozens of hands, those of the steering group and those of the young women, the travellers… all the other women of Aberdeen who attended the various focus groups, and the ones that answered the survey. I only hope our mandala won’t be like those sand ones created for meditation and then left to their fate and blown away by the wind. 

It won’t be. Let’s not let it blow away. 

May those reading—decision-makers, neighbours, allies—see in it something useful, something worth holding onto. And above all, may the wind not carry it away. 

 And tomorrow, one more parent will be able to choose whether to work part-time to stay home with their children or take on full-time hours, because the kids are well cared for, playing with others their age. And this winter, one more family will spend the afternoon at home, warm, having a nutritious snack, fresh food. And a young person over 22 won’t hesitate to go see that new exhibit at the Art Gallery because they can’t afford the bus fare. And there will be one fewer woman dreaming about the key to a safe, pleasant place to raise her daughter, who, by the way… when she grows into an independent woman will use gossip magazines to make collages of night walks down well-lit streets, post-its for a weekend excursion list in affordable public transport, and playdough to shape dolphins leaping in Torry.